We need
to begin construction of our zero energy house by deciding how it will be
built. This decision will impact our design, materials and process. In making
this decision there will be tradeoffs and consequences that must be carefully
analyzed and understood. No design or method can be entirely perfect. After
examining our options, we will choose the method that works best for the goals
of this project.
In the
last article we examined rammed earth, earthships and earthbag construction.
The two methods on our list for consideration here are cordwood and strawbale.
Cordwood
In this
system small, debarked pieces of wood between 12 and 18 inches long are stacked
to create walls. A mortar mix is used to bond the pieces together. This mortar
can be something more conventional using cement or something more natural such
as an adobe or cob. Generally sawdust or some other light weight filler
material is used within the wall or mixed in with the mortar to provide some
insulation. Cordwood is similar in many ways to the rammed earth methods
discussed earlier. They both make good use of natural materials to create an
extremely environmentally friendly building. Unfortunately additional wood
framing is usually required to support the load of the roof. The roof itself
must also be designed separately.
Strawbale
This
method has become a popular due to the tremendous insulation value of
strawbales. Since they are so thick, a wall filled in with strawbales can
easily achieve an R-40 insulation value. This high insulation is very valuable
in the design of a zero energy home. However, like cordwood the bales
themselves are not load-bearing. Although this is possible, it is limited to
certain areas and requires a very careful and well engineered design to be
successful. A separate roof structure is
again necessary.
The definitive straw bale construction website. Contains videos, tutorials and
additional information
Pros and
Cons
The
first important thing to realize is that both cordwood and strawbales are
generally only used for non-load bearing sections of walls. We would prefer our
method to be more all inclusive as was the case with earthbag construction.
Since additional wood framing is necessary, our design becomes more complicated
and more costly. Cordwood and Strawbale are both environmentally friendly and
low cost, although not to the same extent as earthbag construction. Since
cordwood and strawbale make extensive use of adobe and cob, there are also some
climate issues to consider. These designs will be more difficult in areas that
experience a thaw/freeze cycle or in areas that have perpetually high humidity
and precipitation. These methods are also extremely labor intensive. While
being superior in this regard to rammed earth and earthships, they again lose
out to earthbag construction. In most cases we will again have trouble with
conventional building codes depending on the extent to which we utilize
conventional wood framing. The one area in which strawbale construction
undeniably excels is in its extremely high insulation value.
Final
Thoughts
These
methods are just too limited in their use and applicability. They are also
inferior to earthbag construction in most cases. As insulation however, straw
bales are very appealing. Moving forward, we will keep this in mind and try to
look for places where it might be possible to utilize straw bales as
insulation.
No comments:
Post a Comment